刑事诉讼证据开示程序的构建
毕业论文1.59W
内容摘要 证据开示是指控辩双方在庭审前或审判过程,依照一定的程序和方式,相互之间开示各自控制或掌握的诉讼证据和与之有关资料的一种制度。它在促进实体公正、程序公正以及诉讼效率上都有积极的作用。正因为如此,不管是大陆法系国家,还是英美法系国家的刑事诉讼中都建立有一种证据开示制度,且有从单方开示向双方开示、开示范围不断扩大等趋势。我国现行刑事诉讼法虽然也有一些类似证据开示制度的规定,但却很不完整,也很不科学,导致在实践中存在诸多问题。之所以出现这种情况,这与我国重实体轻程序,重打击犯罪轻人权保障的诉讼观念有关,也与我国诉讼模式有关。我国应当根据双向开示、不对等开示等原则,构建具有中国特色的证据开示制度。其中,要尤其注意开示时间、开示地点、开示范围以及开示纠纷的解决等方面的构建。关键词:刑事诉讼 证据开示 程序 构建
On the Construction of Evidence Discovery in Criminal Litigation
Abstract
Evidence discovery is a system which means before putting on trial or during the judging the accuser and the defense according to regular procedures and mode, each other shows lawsuit proof or related material they own mastered. It has played a great part in substantive justice procedural justice and litigation efficiency. As a result, both English-American Legal System Country and Continental Legal System Country have already established Evidence discovery system in Criminal procedure. What’s more, it exists an enlarging tendency from unilateral discovery to both sides discovery. So do the discovery scope. Current Criminal procedure law in our country exist similar regulations on criminal litigation. However, it is neither completed nor scientific. Consequently, it has brought about a great many problems in practice. What causes this situation? I think it is not only related to our country paying much attention to substantiality and punishing crime instead of procedure and human rights but also related to our country’s litigation mode. Our country ought to construct evidence discovery system which have a characteristic our own base on both two-way discovery and unequal discovery principles. Above all we should take notice of constructing on discovery time, discovery address, discovery range and solving of discovery words: Criminal Litigation, Evidence Discovery,Procedure,Construct
前 言
我国在1996 年的刑事诉讼法中,引入了当事人主义诉讼模式的某些合理成分,改变了传统的由法官直接调查证据的方式,确定了控辩双方向法庭举证、质证,同时也不排除法官调查权的'一种特殊的审判方式。这种审判方式的顺利开展,需要相关制度的支撑。证据开示制度就是其中的一个重要制度。但是,1996年的刑事诉讼法不仅没有建立一种完全的证据开示制度,反而加大了律师阅卷难的问题。这和审判方式改革的方向是不相符合的。正因为如此,在我国建立一种证据开示制度目前已基本达成共识。但是如何在我国刑事诉讼中建立证据开示制度,却存在这样或那样的争议。证据开示不仅刑事证据法的规则之一,也是法律程序的一部分;它不仅是实现实体法的手段,而且也是程序公正的重要要求。在我国,虽已有初步的证据开示制度,但还没有建立起实质意义上的控辩双方双向证据开示制度。本文的目的在于通过阐述证据开示制度在刑事诉讼中的重要意义而试图为我国证据开示制度的构建提出一些建议性的措施。论文出处(作者):
论我国量刑规范化的制度改革
On the Construction of Evidence Discovery in Criminal Litigation
Abstract
Evidence discovery is a system which means before putting on trial or during the judging the accuser and the defense according to regular procedures and mode, each other shows lawsuit proof or related material they own mastered. It has played a great part in substantive justice procedural justice and litigation efficiency. As a result, both English-American Legal System Country and Continental Legal System Country have already established Evidence discovery system in Criminal procedure. What’s more, it exists an enlarging tendency from unilateral discovery to both sides discovery. So do the discovery scope. Current Criminal procedure law in our country exist similar regulations on criminal litigation. However, it is neither completed nor scientific. Consequently, it has brought about a great many problems in practice. What causes this situation? I think it is not only related to our country paying much attention to substantiality and punishing crime instead of procedure and human rights but also related to our country’s litigation mode. Our country ought to construct evidence discovery system which have a characteristic our own base on both two-way discovery and unequal discovery principles. Above all we should take notice of constructing on discovery time, discovery address, discovery range and solving of discovery words: Criminal Litigation, Evidence Discovery,Procedure,Construct
前 言
我国在1996 年的刑事诉讼法中,引入了当事人主义诉讼模式的某些合理成分,改变了传统的由法官直接调查证据的方式,确定了控辩双方向法庭举证、质证,同时也不排除法官调查权的'一种特殊的审判方式。这种审判方式的顺利开展,需要相关制度的支撑。证据开示制度就是其中的一个重要制度。但是,1996年的刑事诉讼法不仅没有建立一种完全的证据开示制度,反而加大了律师阅卷难的问题。这和审判方式改革的方向是不相符合的。正因为如此,在我国建立一种证据开示制度目前已基本达成共识。但是如何在我国刑事诉讼中建立证据开示制度,却存在这样或那样的争议。证据开示不仅刑事证据法的规则之一,也是法律程序的一部分;它不仅是实现实体法的手段,而且也是程序公正的重要要求。在我国,虽已有初步的证据开示制度,但还没有建立起实质意义上的控辩双方双向证据开示制度。本文的目的在于通过阐述证据开示制度在刑事诉讼中的重要意义而试图为我国证据开示制度的构建提出一些建议性的措施。论文出处(作者):
论我国量刑规范化的制度改革
-
浅析行动学习法对供电企业班组长培训的重要性
论文摘要:行动学习是一种团队学习的形式。针对工作中的实际问题,团队成员通过充分的交流、质疑、反思,寻找解决工作难题的切实可行的方法。班组是供电企业最基本的细胞,班组长担当了承上启下的角色,引入行动学习的方法可以彻底解决“培训无法落地”的难题,有效提升班...
-
论基于中学生英语交际学习策略指导
论文关键词:初中英语英语交际策略指导论文摘要:本文试就中学生的英语交际学习策略指导作探析,旨在通过运用正确的教学思维模式来提高学生的语言交际和表达技能,从而提高他们的综合语言运用能力。交际策略的指导,不仅是英语课程本质功能的发展必然要求,更是提高学生语...
-
小组合作学习模式应贯彻在初中英语教学的始终
小组合作学习是以学习材料为线索、以学生为主体、以活动为形式,组织学生思考,合作完成某一任务的小组学习活动。在这种学习活动中,学生始终保持一种积极的、主动的学习状态,学生之间利用英语进行理解、交际互动。这一过程的良好实施能引起学生学习兴趣,激发学生积极...
-
有效提高英语课堂教学质量之我见
随着课程改革的深入,许多先进的教育教学理念逐渐为广大教师理解并接受,新的教学方法如同四月的鲜花竞相绽放,在课堂教学中,各地各校教改的呼声一浪高过一浪,教师们也不亦乐乎地投入到教改的大潮中,方法是多样的,但目的是单一的,那就是提高教学质量,如何提高教学质量拙见...